Skip to content

Represent ternary expressions with a dedicated parsetree node - #8674

Merged
cknitt merged 3 commits into
masterfrom
codex/ternary-parsetree-node
Sep 28, 2026
Merged

cknitt merged 3 commits into
masterfrom
codex/ternary-parsetree-node

Conversation

@cknitt

@cknitt cknitt commented Sep 25, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Refs #8624

Summary

  • Add Pexp_ternary with three required operands, so a ternary cannot lack an else branch.
  • Keep the existing res.ternary encoding only in the v0 PPX compatibility bridge.
  • Update typing, printing, AST consumers, and syntax snapshots. Preserve parentheses when a ternary is another ternary's condition.
  • Add bridge tests for round trips, attribute order, and incomplete legacy if nodes.

@cknitt
cknitt force-pushed the codex/ternary-parsetree-node branch from 7f5fa13 to 86f0ba9 Compare September 25, 2026 18:35
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Sep 25, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 77.51938% with 29 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 78.57%. Comparing base (58c6c89) to head (ceb6442).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
compiler/syntax/src/res_parsetree_viewer.ml 36.36% 7 Missing ⚠️
compiler/ml/typecore.ml 37.50% 5 Missing ⚠️
compiler/ml/printast.ml 0.00% 4 Missing ⚠️
compiler/syntax/src/res_parens.ml 50.00% 4 Missing ⚠️
tests/ounit_tests/ounit_ast_mapper0_tests.ml 90.00% 4 Missing ⚠️
analysis/src/hint.ml 33.33% 2 Missing ⚠️
analysis/src/utils.ml 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
compiler/syntax/src/res_comments_table.ml 80.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
compiler/syntax/src/res_printer.ml 80.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #8674   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   78.57%   78.57%           
=======================================
  Files         476      476           
  Lines       64157    64232   +75     
=======================================
+ Hits        50414    50473   +59     
- Misses      13743    13759   +16     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
analysis/src/xform.ml 88.35% <100.00%> (+0.08%) ⬆️
compiler/frontend/bs_builtin_ppx.ml 91.37% <100.00%> (+0.05%) ⬆️
compiler/ml/ast_helper.ml 80.79% <100.00%> (+0.06%) ⬆️
compiler/ml/ast_iterator.ml 93.89% <100.00%> (+0.05%) ⬆️
compiler/ml/ast_mapper.ml 77.58% <100.00%> (+0.09%) ⬆️
compiler/ml/ast_mapper_from0.ml 72.26% <100.00%> (+0.40%) ⬆️
compiler/ml/ast_mapper_to0.ml 71.48% <100.00%> (+0.28%) ⬆️
compiler/ml/depend.ml 83.38% <100.00%> (+0.15%) ⬆️
compiler/ml/pprintast.ml 91.33% <100.00%> (+0.03%) ⬆️
compiler/syntax/src/res_ast_debugger.ml 96.22% <100.00%> (+0.03%) ⬆️
... and 10 more
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@cknitt
cknitt marked this pull request as ready for review September 25, 2026 19:05

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 86f0ba9278

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread compiler/syntax/src/res_comments_table.ml
Comment thread compiler/ml/pprintast.ml Outdated
@cknitt

cknitt commented Sep 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Chef's kiss.

Reviewed commit: 8e699aa5f7

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@pkg-pr-new

pkg-pr-new Bot commented Sep 25, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Open in StackBlitz

rescript

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/rescript@8674

@rescript/belt

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@rescript/belt@8674

@rescript/darwin-arm64

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@rescript/darwin-arm64@8674

@rescript/darwin-x64

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@rescript/darwin-x64@8674

@rescript/linux-arm64

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@rescript/linux-arm64@8674

@rescript/linux-x64

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@rescript/linux-x64@8674

@rescript/runtime

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@rescript/runtime@8674

@rescript/win32-x64

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@rescript/win32-x64@8674

commit: ceb6442

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@cknitt
cknitt requested a review from cristianoc September 25, 2026 20:20
@cknitt
cknitt added this pull request to stack #8683 September 27, 2026 07:10
@cknitt
cknitt force-pushed the codex/ternary-parsetree-node branch from 8e699aa to 482ccee Compare September 27, 2026 07:30
Signed-off-by: Christoph Knittel <ck@cca.io>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Knittel <ck@cca.io>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Knittel <ck@cca.io>
@cknitt
cknitt force-pushed the codex/ternary-parsetree-node branch from 482ccee to ceb6442 Compare September 27, 2026 12:26

@cristianoc cristianoc left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice cleanup. Fewer and fewer dark corners left.

@cknitt
cknitt merged commit cd6712a into master Sep 28, 2026
35 of 36 checks passed
@cknitt
cknitt deleted the codex/ternary-parsetree-node branch September 28, 2026 05:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants