Conversation
doing an (internal) query to fetch metadata from the server broke the currently-running (user) query
|
It seems right however, once #23919 is merged, I would like this PR being rebased upon it. |
|
@devnexen wrote:
I'm totally OK for that, because, even if the second commit is intended to be dropped (containing the part common to both PRs), there will still be the conflict on the intermixed part, about the order to choose for the The canonical order being in the original PR: Thus in case of a statement temporarily paused by an unbuffered query's results coming through, we have kept the cache, which can be of use again once the results have been consumed. Strange case but why not. |
doing an (internal) query to fetch metadata from the server broke the currently-running (user) query
(this is part 2. of #23892 (comment))